Discuss your project

For those who already build with Claude Code

We turn your AI prototype into a system that makes money. Fixed price, no surprises

A one-question architecture session, an audit of your codebase and Claude Code setup, or a turnkey sprint, from a prototype in a week to a multi-agent system in production. Scope and price are fixed before we start, not after the fact.

  • 30+ AI systems built and running in production, not hobby projects
  • Fixed price, no hourly billing. You know the total before we start
  • Multi-agent architecture, prompt caching, hooks and skills

Work formats

Architecture session

$40090 minutes

Contract per project, invoice from Armenia

One architecture question settled in 90 minutes, with a call recording and a written summary in hand.

What is included

  • A 90-minute one-on-one video call. You keep the recording
  • A review of your architecture or draft. You send the code or diagram in advance
  • A written summary after the call with the decision, the reasoning and next steps
  • Recommendations on the model, agent structure and API costs for your specific question
  • Answers to follow-up questions by message for a week after the call

Not in the package

  • Writing code. The session is about the decision, not the implementation
  • A full audit of the whole codebase. That is what the Codebase audit is for
  • A general consultation about everything without a focused question

Who it fits

  • You face one specific architecture decision and want a second opinion
  • You already build with Claude Code but aren't sure whether you need one agent with a big prompt or a multi-agent system
  • You want a sober outside view before spending weeks on implementation

Guarantees

  • If we don't reach a specific decision in 90 minutes, we add up to 30 more minutes at no extra cost — if the question was agreed in advance and didn't change during the call
  • The full session fee is credited toward a sprint — if you decide to build the system within 30 days of the session
Discuss a session

Codebase audit

$5003 to 5 days

Contract per project, invoice from Armenia

A report with a prioritized map of where your codebase and Claude Code setup can improve.

Examples with real prices

  • One-time audit$500

    A full technical review of your code and Claude Code setup, covering agents, hooks, CLAUDE.md and tests. The report and call capture the current state at a single point in time.

  • 30-day supportfrom $2,400

    The audit plus regular code and prompt reviews throughout the following month. Together we set up the process, including tests, CI and agent structure, so vibe coding does not come back.

What is included

  • 30-minute access session. We connect to your repository and Claude Code setup and agree on goals and the main pain points
  • Code review covering architecture, error handling and test coverage, including where there is none
  • Agent and prompt audit showing where context breaks down, where roles are not separated and where CLAUDE.md has grown without structure
  • A map of API cost leaks showing where more tokens are generated than needed and where prompt caching will help
  • A report with a prioritized map of improvement points and a time estimate for each fix
  • 60-minute final call where we go through the report together and answer your questions

Not in the package

  • Implementing the fixes we find. That is what the Claude Code sprint or a separate contract is for
  • Load testing on your live production. We review code and architecture only
  • Design and UI review. We cover code, prompts and architecture only

Who it fits

  • You built an MVP with Claude Code but are not sure it will hold up under its first real users
  • Prompts and agents have grown so much that no one on the team understands them
  • Your API bill is growing faster than your revenue or user count

Guarantees

  • If the report format does not work for you, we redo it for free — if the report does not answer the questions agreed at the start
  • We estimate time and cost for each fix within ±30% instead of saying it is hard to tell
  • The full cost of the one-time audit is credited toward the sprint — if you decide to implement the recommendations within 60 days of the report
Discuss an audit
Most popular

Claude Code sprint

from $1,8001 to 4 weeks

Contract per project, invoice from Armenia

From a prototype in a week to a turnkey production system. Price and timeline are fixed before you say yes.

Examples with real prices

  • Start$1,800

    A prototype of one feature in 1 week, to test a hypothesis or show a working piece of the system before you invest further.

  • Production$3,600

    We deploy to production in 2 weeks, plus a month of support after handover. For a system that already has to handle real users.

  • System$7,000

    A multi-agent system in 4 weeks plus 3 months of support. Several roles, orchestration and a full architecture, not one prompt.

What is included

  • Kickoff call to fix the scope, architecture and acceptance criteria
  • Implementation with tests and error handling, so it works outside our own machine
  • Cost logging for Claude API calls and basic spend control
  • Documentation on how it works, how to change it and what to monitor
  • Project transfer with source code, access and a final call walking through the architecture
  • Warranty support after handover, for a period that depends on the plan

Not in the package

  • An open feature backlog with no clear first task. That is a different format of work
  • Building a new product from scratch without a clear first feature
  • Training your own model or fine-tuning, which is a separate task

Who it fits

  • You have a working prototype or a clear hypothesis and need to take it to production
  • You need a multi-agent system with orchestration and hooks, not one big prompt
  • You are ready to fix the scope at the start and not change it mid-sprint

Guarantees

  • Regressions after handover are fixed within 48 hours — Critical or high severity, during the warranty period of your plan
  • If we miss the plan's deadline, we finish the work for free — If the delay is not caused by blocking answers from your side
  • We do not guarantee business metrics such as conversion or revenue growth, since they depend on your product and data. We guarantee a working system and on-time delivery
Discuss a sprint

Not sure which format fits? Start with an architecture session. In 90 minutes we work through your question, and the fee counts toward the sprint if you decide to build.

How each format works

No surprises. Before we start, you know every stage and what you get at the end.

Architecture session

90 minutes · $400

See the format card

One call on one specific question, such as which model to choose, how to design the flow between agents, where your API budget leaks, or how to split the system into agents, hooks and skills in Claude Code. This is not general mentoring about everything. You get a specific decision for your architecture, plus the call recording and a written summary afterwards.

Stages of work

  1. Preparation · before the call

    You send the code, a diagram or your question in advance. We review it before the call so session time isn't spent reading.

  2. Session · 90 minutes

    We work through the question, talk over the options and arrive at a specific decision. The call is recorded.

  3. Summary · 1 to 2 days

    A written summary of what we decided, why we chose it and what to do next.

  4. Follow-up · one week

    If anything is still unclear after the call, we answer your questions about the session by message.

What you get A call recording and a written summary with a specific decision and a plan of next steps. That is enough to move forward on your own or hand it over to your team.

Codebase audit

3 to 5 days · $500

See the format card

For teams that have already built an MVP with Claude Code and aren't sure it will hold up with real users. We look at the code, tests, prompts, agents, hooks, CLAUDE.md, skills and the project structure as a whole. You don't get general talk about refactoring. You get a specific list of what to fix now, what can wait and where your API budget leaks.

Stages of work

  1. Access and goals · Before the start

    You give us read-only access to the repository and Claude Code config. Then you fill in a short questionnaire about what hurts most.

  2. Technical review · 2 days

    We go through the code, architecture, tests and CI. Prompts, agents, hooks and skills get a separate pass.

  3. Cost analysis · 1 day

    We look at your API call logs if you have them, or estimate from the architecture where the budget is leaking.

  4. Report · 1 to 2 days

    We build a prioritized map that sorts issues into critical, important and can wait, with time estimates.

  5. Final call · 60 minutes

    We go through the report together, answer your questions and discuss the next step.

What you get A report with a prioritized map of improvement points and a call to go through it. You get a clear answer on what to fix first and how much it will cost.

Claude Code sprint

1 to 4 weeks · from $1,800

See the format card

We take one task and bring it to production, from a prototype of one feature to a multi-agent system with documentation. The scope is fixed at the start, with no pay-as-we-go extras and no open-ended estimates. Every sprint includes an architecture session, source code, documentation and project transfer.

Stages of work

  1. Week 0 · before the start

    Kickoff call where we fix the scope and acceptance criteria. What is in and what is out, in writing.

  2. Architecture · 1 to 3 days

    We design the structure, covering agents, hooks, skills, the model and data flow. We agree it with you before writing code.

  3. Implementation · depends on the plan

    We build the system with tests and logging. Interim demos let you adjust course along the way.

  4. Handover · 1 to 2 days

    Testing on real data, documentation, deployment to production or staging.

  5. Transfer · 1 call

    We hand over the project with source code and access, and explain how to maintain it and what to watch in the logs.

What you get A working production system on Claude Code, running in production or on staging as agreed, plus source code, documentation and a support period. It is clear who will maintain it next and how.

Common questions

How is this different from hiring a developer who knows Claude Code?

A developer writes code to your spec. We first look at the task as architects. Why this data flow was chosen, where API costs could get out of hand as load grows, how to split the system into agents and hooks so that someone other than its author can maintain it. The result is not just working code but a system you can hand over and keep developing.

What if the task turns out bigger than expected during the sprint?

Scope is fixed on the kickoff call before we start, together with the price. If something outside the agreed scope comes up during the work, we do not quietly inflate the estimate. We show you what we found and offer options. Add it to the sprint as a separate item, move it to the next sprint, or simplify the original task. The decision is always yours, and the invoice does not grow without your consent.

How does payment work?

A fixed price per package, no hourly billing. 50% upfront before we start, the rest at handover. For a sprint, the rest is due when the agreed stage is complete. There is no open-ended estimate where we see how it goes. We work as a sole proprietor in Armenia. Each project gets a contract and an invoice.

Who is this not for?

If you need a full-time in-house developer or an off-the-shelf SaaS product, we are not the right fit. If the task is an open backlog of features with no clear first step, start with an architecture session to work out where to begin. And if you just need someone who writes code to instructions without asking why, that is not our profile either.

How is a codebase audit different from an architecture session?

A session covers one specific question in 90 minutes, such as choosing a model, designing one flow between agents or working through one bottleneck. An audit covers your whole codebase and Claude Code setup. That means code, tests, prompts, agents, hooks and project structure. If you have one clear question, take the session. If you sense the system has become messy somewhere but don't know exactly where, take the audit.

The code has grown and nobody on the team understands the prompts. Can you work with that?

This is the most common case. Vibe coding usually gives you a working MVP with an opaque structure around it. You end up with agents that have no clear roles, prompts edited ten times for reasons nobody remembers, and no tests. That is exactly what the audit is for. Before fixing anything, you need a map of what is broken and what to fix first.

Request

Tell us about your task

Send us a few words about your task on Telegram or by email. We'll discuss it and estimate it for free. You can write in English, Russian or Armenian.